NAACCR Bibliography Manager

Waterproof watch is how to distinguish between the Watch waterproof function is swiss replica watches generally divided into 30 meters, 50 meters, 100 meters, the main environment, the back cover, the table to the anti The water to reach the corresponding standard waterproof apron. 30 meters water table, which can be used for rolex replica daily grooming or rain, splashing on the surface water is only And there is no water pressure on the table. 50 meters waterproof table is suitable for swimming and housework, 100 meters waterproof table can be used for newwatchesoutlet swimming and diving under water.General waterproof Tables are not in the hot water bath, sauna, environment or the great changes in temperature. Because the waterproof apron will be affected by temperature and thermal expansion and contraction gap thus accelerated aging Influence waterproof function. And the water vapor around the molecule is relatively small, it is easy to penetrate the body, damage to the internal machinery.List to be kept in normal position, thread gauge The screw, do not adjust the table in the water.Even if the table is a professional waterproof waterproof apron also should be replaced after a year, otherwise its waterproof performance can not be guaranteed.The quartz watch is best to replace the waterproof component at the time of rolex replica uk changing the battery, so as to ensure the waterproof performance is good. Diamond watches the diamond is really

Record Details

Title	Should we or shouldn't we compare cancer incidence rates among registries?
Author	Chen, VW
Secondary Authors
Publication Type (Help)	incollection
Book Title	Cancer Incidence in North America, 1988-1991
Type
Month	April
Year	1995
Editor	Howe HL
Pages	V-1-V-7
Volume
Volume
Series
Chapter
Organization
Publisher	North American Association of Central Cancer Registries
Address	Sacramento, CA
Note
URL	http://www.naaccr.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=EjUey8gSoRI%3d&tabid=94&mid=434
PubMed ID
NCI Id
EPub Date
Citation	Chen VW. Should we or shouldn't we compare cancer incidence rates among registries?. In: Howe HL (ed.) Cancer Incidence in North America, 1988-1991. Sacramento, CA: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, April 1995 V-1-V-7. [http://www.naaccr.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=EjUey8gSoRI%3d&tabid=94&mid=434.]

Abstract

A frequent question addressed to central cancer registries is how local rates compare with the national average. Before performing a comparative analysis, an assessment of data comparability and appropriateness of comparisons must be conducted. This article discusses the importance of case definition, case ascertainment completeness, resolution of duplicate tumor reports, missing information on reported cases, and the comparability of populations with regard to age, race, cancer screening participation, prevalence of risk factors, and urbanicity in interpreting such comparative analyses.

Keywords

Keyword
cancer
compare
incidence
rates
registries

WE WOULD LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE OUR PARTNERS IN CANCER SURVEILLANCE

SPONSORS WITH DISTINCTION

LEGAL

This web-site is supported in part with Federal funds by Cooperative Agreement Number 5U58DP001803 from CDC. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC. This web-site is also supported in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract number HHSN261200900015C / ADB No. N02-PC-2009-00015. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NCI, NIH, or DHHS.

NAACCR | North American Association of Central Cancer Registries