Navigation

Support

Waterproof watch is how to distinguish between the Watch waterproof function is swiss replica watches generally divided into 30 meters, 50 meters, 100 meters, the main environment, the back cover, the table to the anti The water to reach the corresponding standard waterproof apron. 30 meters water table, which can be used for rolex replica daily grooming or rain, splashing on the surface water is only And there is no water pressure on the table. 50 meters waterproof table is suitable for swimming and housework, 100 meters waterproof table can be used for newwatchesoutlet swimming and diving under water.General waterproof Tables are not in the hot water bath, sauna, environment or the great changes in temperature. Because the waterproof apron will be affected by temperature and thermal expansion and contraction gap thus accelerated aging Influence waterproof function. And the water vapor around the molecule is relatively small, it is easy to penetrate the body, damage to the internal machinery.List to be kept in normal position, thread gauge The screw, do not adjust the table in the water.Even if the table is a professional waterproof waterproof apron also should be replaced after a year, otherwise its waterproof performance can not be guaranteed.The quartz watch is best to replace the waterproof component at the time of rolex replica uk changing the battery, so as to ensure the waterproof performance is good. Diamond watches the diamond is really

Record Details

Title Epidemiology of myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myeloproliferative disorders in the United States, 2001-2004, using data from the NAACCR and SEER programs
Author Rollison, DE
Secondary Authors Howlader N, Smith MT, Strom SS, Merritt WD, Ries LA, Edwards BK, List AF
Publication Type (Help) article
Journal Blood
Month Jul 1
Year 2008
Pages 45-52
Volume 112
Number 1
Publisher
Address
Note doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-134858
URL http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/112/1/45.long
PubMed ID 18443215
NCI Id
EPub Date 2008 Apr 28
Citation Rollison DE, Howlader N, Smith MT, Strom SS, Merritt WD, Ries LA, Edwards BK, List AF. Epidemiology of myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myeloproliferative disorders in the United States, 2001-2004, using data from the NAACCR and SEER programs. Blood. 2008 Jul 1;112(1):45-52. EPub 2008 Apr 28. PMID 18443215. [http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/112/1/45.long.]
  BibTex    


Abstract

Reporting of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and chronic myeloproliferative disorders (CMDs) to population-based cancer registries in the United States was initiated in 2001. In this first analysis of data from NAACCR, encompassing 82% of the US population, the authors evaluated trends in MDS and CMD incidence, estimated case numbers for the entire United States, and assessed trends in diagnostic recognition and reporting. Based on more than 40 000 observations, average annual age-adjusted incidence rates of MDS and CMD for 2001 through 2003 were 3.3 and 2.1 per 100,000, respectively. Incidence rates increased with age for both MDS and CMD (P < .05) and were highest among whites and non-Hispanics. Based on follow-up data through 2004 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, overall relative 3-year survival rates for MDS and CMD were 45% and 80%, respectively, with males experiencing poorer survival than females. Applying the observed age-specific incidence rates to U.S. Census population estimates, approximately 9,700 patients with MDS and 6,300 patients with CMD were estimated for the entire United States in 2004. MDS incidence rates significantly increased with calendar year in 2001 through 2004, and only 4% of patients were reported to registries by physicians’ offices. Thus, MDS disease burden in the United States may be underestimated.



Keywords

Keyword
epidemiology
myelodysplastic
myeloproliferative
naaccr
seer
united states