NAACCR Bibliography Manager

Waterproof watch is how to distinguish between the Watch waterproof function is swiss replica watches generally divided into 30 meters, 50 meters, 100 meters, the main environment, the back cover, the table to the anti The water to reach the corresponding standard waterproof apron. 30 meters water table, which can be used for rolex replica daily grooming or rain, splashing on the surface water is only And there is no water pressure on the table. 50 meters waterproof table is suitable for swimming and housework, 100 meters waterproof table can be used for newwatchesoutlet swimming and diving under water.General waterproof Tables are not in the hot water bath, sauna, environment or the great changes in temperature. Because the waterproof apron will be affected by temperature and thermal expansion and contraction gap thus accelerated aging Influence waterproof function. And the water vapor around the molecule is relatively small, it is easy to penetrate the body, damage to the internal machinery.List to be kept in normal position, thread gauge The screw, do not adjust the table in the water.Even if the table is a professional waterproof waterproof apron also should be replaced after a year, otherwise its waterproof performance can not be guaranteed.The quartz watch is best to replace the waterproof component at the time of rolex replica uk changing the battery, so as to ensure the waterproof performance is good. Diamond watches the diamond is really

Record Details

Title	Comparative analysis of lung cancer incidence rates in the United States
Author	Chen, VW
Secondary Authors	Wu XC, Andrews PA, Howe HL, Fulton JP, Correa CN, Roffers SD
Publication Type (Help)	incollection
Book Title	Cancer Incidence in North America
Type
Month	April
Year	1996
Editor	HL Howe, et al.
Pages	V-1-V-14
Volume
Volume
Series
Chapter
Organization
Publisher	North American Association of Central Cancer Registries
Address	Sacramento, CA
Note
URL	http://www.naaccr.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=sMFl7tI-1Dw%3d&tabid=95&mid=477
PubMed ID
NCI Id
EPub Date
Citation	Chen VW, Wu XC, Andrews PA, Howe HL, Fulton JP, Correa CN, Roffers SD. Comparative analysis of lung cancer incidence rates in the United States. In: HL Howe, et al. (eds.) Cancer Incidence in North America. Sacramento, CA: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, April 1996 V-1-V-14. [http://www.naaccr.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=sMFl7tI-1Dw%3d&tabid=95&mid=477.]

Abstract

Geographic variations of lung cancer mortality have been observed since the 1950s. Differences in incidence have not been available outside of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program areas until recently. Using data submitted to NAACCR for 1988-1991, three-to-fourfold differences in white populations were found among registries, ranging from 50% higher and 50% lower than the U.S. rates as determined by the SEER Program. Large geographic variations were identified; this information is important for cancer control programs in high-risk states.

Keywords

Keyword
comparative

WE WOULD LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE OUR PARTNERS IN CANCER SURVEILLANCE

SPONSORS WITH DISTINCTION

LEGAL

This web-site is supported in part with Federal funds by Cooperative Agreement Number 5U58DP001803 from CDC. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC. This web-site is also supported in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract number HHSN261200900015C / ADB No. N02-PC-2009-00015. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NCI, NIH, or DHHS.

NAACCR | North American Association of Central Cancer Registries