Navigation

Support

Waterproof watch is how to distinguish between the Watch waterproof function is swiss replica watches generally divided into 30 meters, 50 meters, 100 meters, the main environment, the back cover, the table to the anti The water to reach the corresponding standard waterproof apron. 30 meters water table, which can be used for rolex replica daily grooming or rain, splashing on the surface water is only And there is no water pressure on the table. 50 meters waterproof table is suitable for swimming and housework, 100 meters waterproof table can be used for newwatchesoutlet swimming and diving under water.General waterproof Tables are not in the hot water bath, sauna, environment or the great changes in temperature. Because the waterproof apron will be affected by temperature and thermal expansion and contraction gap thus accelerated aging Influence waterproof function. And the water vapor around the molecule is relatively small, it is easy to penetrate the body, damage to the internal machinery.List to be kept in normal position, thread gauge The screw, do not adjust the table in the water.Even if the table is a professional waterproof waterproof apron also should be replaced after a year, otherwise its waterproof performance can not be guaranteed.The quartz watch is best to replace the waterproof component at the time of rolex replica uk changing the battery, so as to ensure the waterproof performance is good. Diamond watches the diamond is really

Search Records

 

Search By Keyword:  

A
Adolescent
Assess
Ampullary
Agriculturally
Adults
Aggregation
Annual report
American indian
Asians/pacific islanders
Age
Acute
Algorithms
Alaska native

B
Bile duct
Brain
Breast

C
Colorectal
Cancer
Case ascertainment
Completeness
Counts
Compare
Calendar year
Comparative
Compatibility
Certification
Classification
Children
Carcinoma
Consistency
Cervical
County
Childhood
Cina
Combined
Confidentiality
Canada
Cutaneous
Coding
Cina deluxe
Corpus
Census		 D
Data
Descriptive
Demographic
Distant stage
Disease
Diagnosis
Diagnosed
Disparities
Data security
Death certificate

E
Evaluation
Epidemiology
Extraovarian
Ethnicity
Extrahepatic
Estimate
Extranodal
Edits
Esophageal

F
Fallopian tube
Female

G
Geographic
Gallbladder
Gastric

H
Hl7
Histology
Hispanic
Heuristic
Hpv
Hysterectomy		 I
Incidence
Identifiability
Invasive
Industry
Iarc

L
Lung
Lymphomas
Latino
Laterality
Lymphocytic
Leukemia

M
Mortality
Myelodysplastic
Myeloproliferative
Medical care
Method
Morphology
Melanoma
Malignant
Multiple primary
Men
Mastectomy

N
National
Non-carcinoma
Non-hodgkin
North america
Naaccr
Nation
Nhia
Noncutaneous

O
Ovarian
Ovary
Occupation
Override flag		 P
Patterns
Predicting
Population-based
Pathology
Primary
Penile
Peritoneal
Papillary serous
Peritoneum
Poverty
Prostate

Q
Quality

R
Rural
Registries
Rates
Ratio
Race
Residence
Rare
Registry
Registry-specific

S
Screening
Subtype
Survival
Stage
Subsite
Submission
Surveillance
Statistics
Seer
Solar
Summary stage

T
Tobacco
Travel time
Tumor
Trends
Treatment		 U
Urban
United states
Ultraviolet b
Uterine

V
Variation
Vaccination

W
Women

Y
Young adults


Citation
Pdf
Url
Henry KA, Sherman R, Farber S, Cockburn M, Goldberg DW, Stroup AM. The joint effects of census tract poverty and geographic access on late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in 10 U.S. states. Health Place. 2013 Feb 28;21C:110-121. PMID 23454732. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829213000130.] link
Boscoe FP, Johnson CJ, Henry KA, Goldberg DW, Shahabi K, Elkin EB, Ballas LK, Cockburn M. Geographic proximity to treatment for early stage breast cancer and likelihood of mastectomy. Breast. 2011 Aug;20(4):324-8. EPub 2011 Mar 25. PMID 21440439. [http://www.thebreastonline.com/article/S0960-9776(11)00056-7/abstract.] link
Henry KA, Boscoe FP, Johnson CJ, Goldberg DW, Sherman R, Cockburn M. Breast cancer stage at diagnosis: is travel time important?. J Community Health. 2011 Dec;36(6):933-42. PMID 21461957. [http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10900-011-9392-4.] link
Hausauer AK, Keegan TH, Chang ET, Glaser SL, Howe H, Clarke CA. Recent trends in breast cancer incidence in US white women by county-level urban/rural and poverty status. BMC Med. 2009 Jun 26;7:31. PMID 19558637. [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/7/31.] link
Goodman MT, Tung KH, Wilkens LR. Comparative epidemiology of breast cancer among men and women in the United States, 1996 to 2000. Cancer causes Control. 2006 Mar;17(2):127-36. PMID 16425090. [http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10552-005-5384-y.] link
Smigal C, Jemal A, Ward E, Cokkinides V, Smith R, Howe HL, Thun M. Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity: update 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 May-Jun;56(3):168-83. PMID 16737949.
Joslyn SA, Foote ML, Nasseri K, Coughlin SS, Howe HL. Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer rates by age: NAACCR breast cancer project. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Jul;92(2):97-105. PMID 15986118. [http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10549-005-2112-y.] link
Howe HL, Weinstein R, Alvi R, Kohler B, Ellison JH. Women with multiple primary breast cancers diagnosed within a five year period, 1994-1998. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Apr;90(3):223-32. PMID 15830135. [http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10549-004-4258-4.] link
Wingo PA, Jamison PM, Young JL, Gargiullo P. Population-based statistics for women diagnosed with inflammatory breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Apr;15(3):321-8. PMID 15090727.
Perkins CI, Hotes J, Kohler BA, Howe HL. Association between breast cancer laterality and tumor location, United States, 1994-1998. Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Sep;15(7):637-45. PMID 15280621.
Hotes JL, Ellison LF, Howe HL, Friesen I, Kohler B. Variation in breast cancer counts using SEER and IARC multiple primary coding rules. Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Mar;15(2):185-91. PMID 15017131.
Young JL, Ward KC, Wingo PA, Howe HL. The incidence of malignant non-carcinomas of the female breast. Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Apr;15(3):313-9. PMID 15090726.